Directions (Q. 1-5): In each of the questions below are given statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seen to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer:
1) if only I follows.
2) if only II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if both I and II follow.
5) if neither I nor II follows.
1. Statements: All rats are cats. Some cats are pets.
Conclusions: I. All rats being pets is a possiblity. II. Some cats can never be rats.
2. Statements: Some bats are hockeys. No bat is a ball.
Conclusions: I. There is a possibility that some hockeys are balls.
II. No hockey is a ball.
3. Statements: Some boys are honest. Some honests are intelligent.
Conclusions: I. At least some boys are intelligent. II. All boys are intelligent.
4. Statements: All carrots are parrots. All parrots are green.
Conclusions: I. There is a possiblity that some parrots are not carrots.
II. Some carrots are not green.
5. Statements: All handles are candles. No candle is a pandle.
Conclusions: I. All handles can never be pandles. II. All candles being handles is a possibility.
Answers
1) if only I follows.
2) if only II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if both I and II follow.
5) if neither I nor II follows.
1. Statements: All rats are cats. Some cats are pets.
Conclusions: I. All rats being pets is a possiblity. II. Some cats can never be rats.
2. Statements: Some bats are hockeys. No bat is a ball.
Conclusions: I. There is a possibility that some hockeys are balls.
II. No hockey is a ball.
3. Statements: Some boys are honest. Some honests are intelligent.
Conclusions: I. At least some boys are intelligent. II. All boys are intelligent.
4. Statements: All carrots are parrots. All parrots are green.
Conclusions: I. There is a possiblity that some parrots are not carrots.
II. Some carrots are not green.
5. Statements: All handles are candles. No candle is a pandle.
Conclusions: I. All handles can never be pandles. II. All candles being handles is a possibility.
Answers
Directions (Q. 1-5): In each of the questions below are given statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seen to be at variance with commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer:
1) if only I follows.
2) if only II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if both I and II follow.
5) if neither I nor II follows.
1. Statements: All rats are cats. Some cats are pets.
Conclusions: I. All rats being pets is a possiblity. II. Some cats can never be rats.
2. Statements: Some bats are hockeys. No bat is a ball.
Conclusions: I. There is a possibility that some hockeys are balls.
II. No hockey is a ball.
3. Statements: Some boys are honest. Some honests are intelligent.
Conclusions: I. At least some boys are intelligent. II. All boys are intelligent.
4. Statements: All carrots are parrots. All parrots are green.
Conclusions: I. There is a possiblity that some parrots are not carrots.
II. Some carrots are not green.
5. Statements: All handles are candles. No candle is a pandle.
Conclusions: I. All handles can never be pandles. II. All candles being handles is a possibility.
Answers
1) if only I follows.
2) if only II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if both I and II follow.
5) if neither I nor II follows.
1. Statements: All rats are cats. Some cats are pets.
Conclusions: I. All rats being pets is a possiblity. II. Some cats can never be rats.
2. Statements: Some bats are hockeys. No bat is a ball.
Conclusions: I. There is a possibility that some hockeys are balls.
II. No hockey is a ball.
3. Statements: Some boys are honest. Some honests are intelligent.
Conclusions: I. At least some boys are intelligent. II. All boys are intelligent.
4. Statements: All carrots are parrots. All parrots are green.
Conclusions: I. There is a possiblity that some parrots are not carrots.
II. Some carrots are not green.
5. Statements: All handles are candles. No candle is a pandle.
Conclusions: I. All handles can never be pandles. II. All candles being handles is a possibility.
Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment